HNRK Coverage Corner
On October 28, 2019, Justice Borrok of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. ICCO Cheese Co., Inc., 2019 NY Slip Op 33224(U), holding that a CGL carrier had no duty to defend consumer fraud class actions against Walmart because the complaints did not allege claims for “bodily injury” or “property damage.”
Walmart was sued in class actions across the country (consolidated in an MDL proceeding) for allegedly mislabeling parmesan cheese sold under its Great Value brand as “100% grated Parmesan cheese when, in reality, it ...
On September 23, 2019, Justice Rodriguez of the New York County Supreme Court issued a decision in Wesco Ins. Co. v. Hellas Glass Works Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 32848(U), holding that two liability insurers were required to share in paying defense costs where facts to be determined in the underlying personal injury lawsuit could trigger indemnity coverage under one of the policies.
The coverage issue in Hellas Glass turned on a fact to be resolved in the underlying personal injury litigation – namely, whether the injury occurred in the course of “loading” or “unloading” glass ...
On August 27, 2019, Judge Pauley of the SDNY issued a decision in Gemini Ins. Co. v. Titan Construction Servs., Case No. 17-cv-8963, dismissing a declaratory judgment claim as premature because the lability insurer’s duty to indemnify would depend on facts to be developed in the underlying lawsuit against the insured. The court explained:
It has long been well-established that a liability insurer may bring an action for a declaratory judgment against the parties in an underlying lawsuit involving its insured without waiting for the underlying action to proceed to judgment ...
On September 10, 2019, Judge Reiss of the WDNY issued a decision in Korn v. Federal Ins. Co., Case No. 1:17-cv-00188, ruling that an insurance carrier providing a defense to the insured in a criminal prosecution had no obligation to “monitor” the fees incurred by defense counsel to ensure that the coverage was not exhausted prior to trial.
Korn, an insured brought breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract claims against a liability insurer, alleging that the insurance company failed “to monitor his criminal defense attorneys, audit the legal fees they incurred, and ...
On August 26, 2019, Judge Caproni of the SDNY issued a decision in Spandex House, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., Case No. 18-CV-8367 (VEC), enforcing an IP exclusion in a CGL policy that circumvented the “entire action” rule by precluding both defense and indemnity coverage for an otherwise-covered “advertising injury” claim if that claim was joined with any IP claim unconnected to advertising. As Judge Caproni explains, under a duty to defend policy, “if a lawsuit contains a mix of allegations covered by an insurance policy and other allegations falling outside the ...
Search Blog
Recent Posts
- Canons of Construction: Divided Panel of the Second Circuit Holds General Contractor Entitled to Additional Insured Coverage Under Subcontractor’s CGL Policy
- Washington Federal Court Addresses Reformation of CGL Policy, and Late Notice and Prior Acts Exclusions under D&O Policy
- Delaware Court Rules DOJ’s Civil Investigative Demand Constitutes a Covered Claim
- Seventh Circuit Clarifies Excess Insurer Duties and Additional Insurer Analysis Under Indiana Law
- Southern District Uses Mutual Mistake Doctrine to Reform Policy and Find Coverage
- No Accident, No Coverage: Second Circuit Rejects Defense Cost Coverage in Ghost Gun Litigation
- D&O Insurer Fails to Meet Its Burden To Allocate Settlement Under “Relative Exposure” Rule
- New Jersey Federal Court Holds Multi-Year Embezzlement Was a Single Occurrence
- Second Circuit Affirms Coverage for Oil Seized in Venezuela as part of an “Insurrection"
- Fifth Circuit Holds Contractual ADR Process Constitutes A “Suit” Under CGL Policy
Popular Categories
- CGL Policies
- Policy Exclusions
- Additional Insured Endorsement
- Construction
- D&O Policies
- Insurance Coverage
- E&O Policies
- Notice
- Duty to Defend
- Damages
- Occurrence/Accident
- Business Interruption Coverage
- Related Claims
- Bad Faith Claims Handling
- Rules of Interpretation
- Indemnification and Advancement
- COVID-19
- Cyber Coverage
- Duty to Cooperate
- Advertising Injury
- Pollution Exclusion
- Personal and Advertising Injury
- Insurance Brokers
- Appraisal
- Confict of Laws
- Discovery/Disclosure
- Excess Insurance
- Attorney Fees
- Assignment of Claims
- Covered Loss
- Disability discrimination
- Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
- Privilege/Work Product
- Intellectual Property
- Priority of Coverage
- Contracts
- Professional Malpractice
- Rescission
- Intervention/Joinder
- Subrogation
- General Business Law
- Settlements
- Unfair Claims Settlement Practices
Archives
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- May 2025
- February 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- September 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- November 2021
- June 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
