HNRK Coverage Corner
On May 29, 2024, Judge John T. Dorsey of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware issued a decision in Insys Liquidation Trust v. XL Specialty Ins. Co., Adv. Proc. No. 23-50484 (JTD), granting an excess D&O insurer’s motion for summary judgment under the policy’s Prior and Pending Litigation Exclusion. The wrinkle here is that the “prior litigation” was a qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act that had been filed under seal before the policy period but was never served. Although the insured did not know—and could not have known—about the lawsuit ...
On March 21, 2024, the Fifth Circuit issued a decision in SXSW, L.L.C. v. Federal Ins. Co., Case No. 22-50933, holding that a liability policy’s contract and professional services exclusions did not bar defense coverage for a class action lawsuit on behalf of ticket holders seeking refunds for a festival canceled in the early months of the Covid-19 pandemic.
In the class action, SXSW, which hosts a yearly festival in Austin, Texas, faced ticket holder claims for breach of contract, as well as unjust enrichment and conversion, arising from its refusal to give refunds (as opposed to ...
On February 6, 2023, Justice Louis L. Nock of the New York County Supreme Court issued a decision in Wesco Ins. Co. v. Nunez Dental Servs., P.C., 2023 NY Slip Op 30373(U), holding that a criminal acts exclusion barred coverage for a lawsuit alleging violations of the rights of privacy and publicity under the N.Y. Civil Rights Law, despite the fact that the insured was never convicted, or even charged with, a crime.
The underlying lawsuit alleged that the insured, Nunez Dental, misappropriated the image of the plaintiff’s image to advertise Nunez’s dental services. Among other ...
On April 22, 2022, the New York Appellate Division, First Department issued a decision in Madison Square Boys & Girls Club, Inc. v. Atlantic Specialty Ins. Co., 2022 NY Slip Op 02625, holding that a sexual abuse exclusion applied to claims for negligent supervision.
This coverage action arose out of a lawsuit by former members of the Madison Square Boys and Girls Club, who alleged that they were sexually abused as children by a former volunteer and former coach for the organization. Madison Square sought coverage under a claims-made liability policy for the lawsuit, which asserted ...
On April 9, 2021, the Second Circuit issued a decision in Fabrique Innovations, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company, 20-1396-cv, holding that a policy’s “willful acts” exclusions were not triggered by a “simple breach of contract.” (N.B. HRNK insurance recovery partner Joshua Blosveren successfully represented the Appellee in this appeal.) The insured (“Fabrique”) made a claim under a cargo insurance policy that covered damage to fabric and plush merchandise temporarily in storage at specified locations. The goods at issue were lost “after Hancock Fabrics ...
Search Blog
Recent Posts
- Brad Nash Quoted in Law360 Insurance Authority on Chisholm’s-Village Plaza LLC v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.
- Brad Nash and Milan Sova Author Article in ABA Journal on Wildfire Coverage and Occurrence Disputes
- HNRK Insurance Recovery Partners Author Article for Chambers 2025 Global Practice Guide
- The Coverage Corner is Vindicated! North Carolina Supreme Court Rules That Covid-19 Business Interruption Losses Are Covered by Commercial Property Insurance Policy
- Court Rejects Excess Insurer’s Attempt to Avoid Coverage Based on “Improper Erosion” of Primary Policy Limits
- HNRK in the New York Law Journal on the “Expected or Intended” Exclusion Standard Coverage Defense
- Delaware Bankruptcy Court Rules That Qui Tam Action Filed Under Seal—and Never Served—Triggers D&O Policy’s Prior and Pending Litigation Exclusion
- “Related Acts” and the Claims Made Policy—The Policy Provision that “Cannot Be Applied Literally”
- California Court Rules that FTC’s Civil Investigative Demand is Not a Covered Claim Under Technology Errors and Omissions Policy
- Delaware Court Dismisses D&O Coverage Action as Premature Under Policy’s “No Action” Clause
Popular Categories
- Insurance Coverage
- CGL Policies
- Policy Exclusions
- Duty to Defend
- D&O Policies
- Damages
- Occurrence/Accident
- E&O Policies
- Additional Insured Endorsement
- Related Claims
- Business Interruption Coverage
- Rules of Interpretation
- Construction
- Bad Faith Claims Handling
- Indemnification and Advancement
- Cyber Coverage
- COVID-19
- Pollution Exclusion
- Duty to Cooperate
- Advertising Injury
- Personal and Advertising Injury
- Excess Insurance
- Insurance Brokers
- Confict of Laws
- Appraisal
- Discovery/Disclosure
- Attorney Fees
- Assignment of Claims
- Covered Loss
- Disability discrimination
- Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
- Notice
- Privilege/Work Product
- Priority of Coverage
- Contracts
- Intellectual Property
- Professional Malpractice
- Rescission
- Intervention/Joinder
- Settlements
- Subrogation
- General Business Law
- Unfair Claims Settlement Practices
Archives
- May 2025
- February 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- September 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- November 2021
- June 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018