HNRK Coverage Corner
On December 17, 2019, the First Department issued a decision in McGraw-Hill Education, Inc. v. Illinois National Insurance Company, 2019 NY Slip Op 08960, ordering an insurer to provide defense coverage in a copyright infringement action, absent a “judicial determination” that the infringements were intentional. This coverage action arose from over two dozen copyright infringement lawsuits filed across the country against textbook publisher McGraw-Hill Education, Inc. by commercial photographers and stock photography agencies, alleging unauthorized publication ...
On November 20, 2019, Judge Briccetti of the SDNY issued a decision in Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Comley, Case No. 18-cv-9259 (VB), holding that a liability insurer properly denied defense coverage, under an exclusion for “intentional and criminal acts”, for a lawsuit alleging “negligent supervision” of the insureds’ minor son, who committed a sexual assault. The policy at issue—a homeowners’ policy—covered both the parents and their “relatives”, who are “resident[s] of the same household.” The policy’s “intentional and criminal ...
On May 29, 2019, Justice Crane of the New York County Supreme Court issued a decision in Continental Cas. Co. v KB Ins. Co., Ltd., 2019 NY Slip Op 31513(U), holding that an exclusion for “Knowing Acts” did not excuse a CGL carrier’s duty to defend Lanham Act claims against the insured. In the underlying litigation, the insured, Value Wholesale, Inc. (Value), was sued by the patent holder for FreeStyle blood glucose test strips for allegedly selling imported test strips not authorized for sale in the United States and selling them in FreeStyle product boxes. The action asserted ...
On April 25, 2019, Justice Sherwood of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Schorsch, 2019 NY Slip Op 31188(U), holding that a D&O policy's “insured versus insured” exclusion did not preclude coverage for claims against corporate officers by a Creditor Trust. In Schorsch, corporate officers sought coverage under the corporation’s D&O policies for claims brought against them by a Creditor Trust set up in the corporation’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. Two of the excess insurers disclaimed coverage based on an ...
On November 26, 2018, Judge Feuerstein of the EDNY issued a decision in Merritt Environmental Consulting Corp. v. Great Divide Ins. Co., 17-CV-7495, holding that a policy exclusion for claims “arising out of” radioactive contamination did not require proximate causation, but rather “some causal relationship” between the contamination and the claim. In Merritt Environmental, an environmental consulting business sought coverage under a professional liability policy for lawsuits by a client alleging that Merritt negligently failed to identify radioactive ...
Search Blog
Recent Posts
- Second Circuit Affirms Coverage for Oil Seized in Venezuela as part of an “Insurrection"
- Fifth Circuit Holds Contractual ADR Process Constitutes A “Suit” Under CGL Policy
- Do No Action Clauses Prevent Suits to Enforce a D&O Insurer’s Duty to Advance Defense Costs Before the Underlying Litigation Is Resolved? The Delaware Supreme Court Remands for More Briefing
- Insurer Can’t Use “Care, Custody, and Control” Exclusion to Escape Duty to Defend Property Manager
- Federal Court Applies Delaware’s “Meaningful Linkage” Standard To Find Lawsuits Related to Earlier Notice of Circumstances
- Assignment of Insurance Rights in a Settlement Did not Extinguish Insurer’s Duty of Indemnity
- Who is “You” When it Comes to Self-Insured Retentions?
- Brad Nash Quoted in Law360 Insurance Authority on Chisholm’s-Village Plaza LLC v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.
- Brad Nash and Milan Sova Author Article in ABA Journal on Wildfire Coverage and Occurrence Disputes
- HNRK Insurance Recovery Partners Author Article for Chambers 2025 Global Practice Guide
Popular Categories
- CGL Policies
- Insurance Coverage
- D&O Policies
- Policy Exclusions
- Duty to Defend
- Damages
- Occurrence/Accident
- E&O Policies
- Additional Insured Endorsement
- Business Interruption Coverage
- Related Claims
- Rules of Interpretation
- Construction
- Bad Faith Claims Handling
- Indemnification and Advancement
- COVID-19
- Cyber Coverage
- Duty to Cooperate
- Advertising Injury
- Pollution Exclusion
- Personal and Advertising Injury
- Insurance Brokers
- Appraisal
- Confict of Laws
- Discovery/Disclosure
- Excess Insurance
- Attorney Fees
- Assignment of Claims
- Covered Loss
- Disability discrimination
- Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
- Notice
- Privilege/Work Product
- Priority of Coverage
- Contracts
- Intellectual Property
- Professional Malpractice
- Intervention/Joinder
- Rescission
- Subrogation
- Settlements
- General Business Law
- Unfair Claims Settlement Practices
Archives
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- May 2025
- February 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- September 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- November 2021
- June 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
