HNRK Coverage Corner
On February 6, 2023, Justice Louis L. Nock of the New York County Supreme Court issued a decision in Wesco Ins. Co. v. Nunez Dental Servs., P.C., 2023 NY Slip Op 30373(U), holding that a criminal acts exclusion barred coverage for a lawsuit alleging violations of the rights of privacy and publicity under the N.Y. Civil Rights Law, despite the fact that the insured was never convicted, or even charged with, a crime.
The underlying lawsuit alleged that the insured, Nunez Dental, misappropriated the image of the plaintiff’s image to advertise Nunez’s dental services. Among other causes of action, the complaint asserted violations of Civil Rights Law §§ 50-51. Section 50 of the statute provides that “[a] person, firm or corporation that uses for advertising purposes, or for the purposes of trade, the name, portrait or picture of any living person without having first obtained the written consent of such person . . . is guilty of a misdemeanor.” The insured’s CGL policy had a criminal acts exclusion, barring coverage for any claim that “aris[es] out of a criminal act committed by or at the direction of the insured.” Although there were other civil causes of action in the complaint, the insurer argued that this exclusion applied because New York law defines the underlying conduct—unauthorized use of a person’s portrait or picture—as a crime.
Justice Nock agreed and granted summary judgment to the insurer, explaining:
[The criminal acts] exclusion applies regardless of whether the insured is actually convicted of, or even charged with, a crime. (Kenhoe v Nationwide Mut. Fire. Ins. Co., 299 AD2d 318, 319 [2d Dept 2002]). Moreover the Court of Appeals has interpreted the phrase “arising out of” broadly in the next of the criminal acts exclusion, holding that where criminal conduct is the operative act necessary to establish liability, the underlying plaintiff’s theory of recovery does not control whether the exclusion applies.
In opposition, Davalos argues that Nunez harbored the belief that it had obtained Davalos’ consent to use her image, and (the argument goes), per that belief, Nunez did not commit or direct a criminal act. However, those allegations are not contained within Davalos’ underlying complaint, and thus are not relevant to whether plaintiffs rightfully disclaimed coverage (A.J. Sheepskin and Leather Co., Inc. [v. Colonia Insurance Company,] 273 AD2d [107,] 107 [2d Dept 2000]). Further, the allegations of the underlying complaint are a sufficient basis to deny coverage even in the absence of a finding that the alleged conduct took place. . . .
Justice Nock cites the Second Department’s decision in Kenhoe for the proposition that a criminal acts exclusion “applies regardless of whether the insured is actually convicted of, or even charged with, a crime.” But importantly, in that case, “[t]he subject policy explicitly excluded coverage . . . regardless of whether the insured was actually charged with, or convicted of, a crime.” Kehoe, 299 A.D.2d at 319. Here by contrast, the policy is silent on that question. Further, the decision dismisses the relevance of Nunez’s subject intent on the ground “those allegations are not contained within [the] complaint.” But this ignores the well-established rule that insurers must consider extrinsic evidence that establishes a potential basis for coverage. See Fitzpatrick v. American Honda Motor Co., 78 N.Y.2d 61, 66-67 (1991). The insured has filed a notice of appeal. We will continue to follow the case in the First Department.
- Partner
Bradley Nash represents policyholders in insurance disputes and other parties in complex commercial litigation in state and federal courts in New York and across the country. Brad focuses his practice on insurance recovery for ...
Search Blog
Recent Posts
- Hawaii Supreme Court Holds That Insurers May Not Recoup Defense Costs for Uncovered Claims Absent Express Policy Provision for Reimbursement
- Is Carbon a “Pollutant”? — The Supreme Courts of Alaska and Hawaii Receive Certified Questions Regarding Scope of Pollution Exclusions in Liability Policies
- Court Rules That D&O Policy’s “Bump-Up” Exclusion Does Not Apply to Merger Transaction
- Eleventh Circuit Rules Insurer Cannot Recoup Defense Costs Under Duty to Defend Policy
- Federal Court Declines to Exercise Jurisdiction Over Insurer’s Declaratory Judgment Action That Raised “Novel Issue of Ohio Insurance Law”
- Bankruptcy Court Lifts Automatic Stay to Permit Officers of Silicon Valley Bank to Access D&O Coverage
- E&O Policy Exclusion Bars Coverage for Negligence Claim Against Law Firm Arising from Third Party’s Misappropriation of Client’s Funds
- New Jersey Appellate Court Holds That Policy’s War Exclusion Did Not Apply to State-Sponsored Cyberattack
- New York Court Discusses Appellate Division Split Over Recoupment of Defense Costs Under a Duty to Defend Policy
- Delaware Law Governs D&O Policy Issued to Delaware Corporation Doing Business Outside the State
Popular Categories
- Duty to Defend
- Insurance Coverage
- D&O Policies
- Occurrence/Accident
- Policy Exclusions
- CGL Policies
- Pollution Exclusion
- E&O Policies
- Cyber Coverage
- Additional Insured Endorsement
- Business Interruption Coverage
- Construction
- Bad Faith Claims Handling
- COVID-19
- Indemnification and Advancement
- Damages
- Excess Insurance
- Duty to Cooperate
- Advertising Injury
- Rules of Interpretation
- Related Claims
- Personal and Advertising Injury
- Covered Loss
- Insurance Brokers
- Confict of Laws
- Discovery/Disclosure
- Appraisal
- Attorney Fees
- Assignment of Claims
- Disability discrimination
- Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
- Notice
- Privilege/Work Product
- Priority of Coverage
- Intellectual Property
- Contracts
- Professional Malpractice
- Rescission
- Intervention/Joinder
- Subrogation
- Settlements
- General Business Law
- Unfair Claims Settlement Practices
Archives
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- September 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- November 2021
- June 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018