HNRK Coverage Corner
On February 6, 2023, Justice Louis L. Nock of the New York County Supreme Court issued a decision in Wesco Ins. Co. v. Nunez Dental Servs., P.C., 2023 NY Slip Op 30373(U), holding that a criminal acts exclusion barred coverage for a lawsuit alleging violations of the rights of privacy and publicity under the N.Y. Civil Rights Law, despite the fact that the insured was never convicted, or even charged with, a crime.
The underlying lawsuit alleged that the insured, Nunez Dental, misappropriated the image of the plaintiff’s image to advertise Nunez’s dental services. Among other causes of action, the complaint asserted violations of Civil Rights Law §§ 50-51. Section 50 of the statute provides that “[a] person, firm or corporation that uses for advertising purposes, or for the purposes of trade, the name, portrait or picture of any living person without having first obtained the written consent of such person . . . is guilty of a misdemeanor.” The insured’s CGL policy had a criminal acts exclusion, barring coverage for any claim that “aris[es] out of a criminal act committed by or at the direction of the insured.” Although there were other civil causes of action in the complaint, the insurer argued that this exclusion applied because New York law defines the underlying conduct—unauthorized use of a person’s portrait or picture—as a crime.
Justice Nock agreed and granted summary judgment to the insurer, explaining:
[The criminal acts] exclusion applies regardless of whether the insured is actually convicted of, or even charged with, a crime. (Kenhoe v Nationwide Mut. Fire. Ins. Co., 299 AD2d 318, 319 [2d Dept 2002]). Moreover the Court of Appeals has interpreted the phrase “arising out of” broadly in the next of the criminal acts exclusion, holding that where criminal conduct is the operative act necessary to establish liability, the underlying plaintiff’s theory of recovery does not control whether the exclusion applies.
In opposition, Davalos argues that Nunez harbored the belief that it had obtained Davalos’ consent to use her image, and (the argument goes), per that belief, Nunez did not commit or direct a criminal act. However, those allegations are not contained within Davalos’ underlying complaint, and thus are not relevant to whether plaintiffs rightfully disclaimed coverage (A.J. Sheepskin and Leather Co., Inc. [v. Colonia Insurance Company,] 273 AD2d [107,] 107 [2d Dept 2000]). Further, the allegations of the underlying complaint are a sufficient basis to deny coverage even in the absence of a finding that the alleged conduct took place. . . .
Justice Nock cites the Second Department’s decision in Kenhoe for the proposition that a criminal acts exclusion “applies regardless of whether the insured is actually convicted of, or even charged with, a crime.” But importantly, in that case, “[t]he subject policy explicitly excluded coverage . . . regardless of whether the insured was actually charged with, or convicted of, a crime.” Kehoe, 299 A.D.2d at 319. Here by contrast, the policy is silent on that question. Further, the decision dismisses the relevance of Nunez’s subject intent on the ground “those allegations are not contained within [the] complaint.” But this ignores the well-established rule that insurers must consider extrinsic evidence that establishes a potential basis for coverage. See Fitzpatrick v. American Honda Motor Co., 78 N.Y.2d 61, 66-67 (1991). The insured has filed a notice of appeal. We will continue to follow the case in the First Department.
- Partner
Bradley Nash represents policyholders in insurance disputes and other parties in complex commercial litigation in state and federal courts in New York and across the country. Brad focuses his practice on insurance recovery for ...
Search Blog
Recent Posts
- Ohio Supreme Court Rules Computer Software Cannot Be Subject To “Physical Loss” Or “Physical Damage” Under Insured’s Property Insurance Policy
- Criminal Acts Exclusion Bars Coverage Even Though Insured Not Charged With, or Convicted of, a Crime
- Insurer Not Permitted to Recoup Defense Costs Absent Express Reservation of the Right to Do So
- Liability Insurer May Not Deny Defense Coverage Based On Extrinsic Evidence “Bound Up With the Merits of the Underlying Case”
- Second Circuit Rules That Lower-Tier Excess Policies Were Exhausted by Below-Limits Settlement with Insured
- Does Contra Proferentem Apply to the “Sophisticated Insured”?
- Sexual Misconduct Exclusion Bars Coverage for Negligence Supervision Claim
- Delaware Supreme Court Rejects “Fundamentally Identical” Standard for Interpreting Related Claims Provision
- New York Court of Appeals Rules That Disgorgement Payment to SEC Did Not Constitute an Uninsured Penalty
- “Intentional Nonperformance” of Contractual Obligations Does Not Trigger Policy’s “Willful Acts”
Popular Categories
- Insurance Coverage
- Policy Exclusions
- Duty to Defend
- Cyber Coverage
- CGL Policies
- Additional Insured Endorsement
- D&O Policies
- Business Interruption Coverage
- Excess Insurance
- Construction
- Bad Faith Claims Handling
- COVID-19
- Occurrence/Accident
- Indemnification and Advancement
- Damages
- Rules of Interpretation
- Related Claims
- Duty to Cooperate
- Advertising Injury
- Covered Loss
- Personal and Advertising Injury
- Insurance Brokers
- Confict of Laws
- Discovery/Disclosure
- Appraisal
- Attorney Fees
- Assignment of Claims
- Disability discrimination
- Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
- Notice
- Privilege/Work Product
- Priority of Coverage
- Intellectual Property
- Contracts
- E&O Policies
- Professional Malpractice
- Rescission
- Intervention/Joinder
- Subrogation
- Settlements
- General Business Law
- Unfair Claims Settlement Practices
Archives
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- September 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- November 2021
- June 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018