HNRK Coverage Corner

Today at the Coverage Corner, we examine a Fifth Circuit decision that ponders a fundamental question: What is a “suit”? A complaint filed in court or arbitration demand seeking money damages should qualify. But what about a pre-lawsuit ADR procedure? Like all questions of policy interpretation, the answer lies in the policy language, construed in accordance with the established rules of policy interpretation (including, for example, the canon that ambiguities are construed “in favor of the insured”).

At issue in BPX Prod. Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s ...

This week at the Coverage Corner, we return with an update on a Delaware case about which we’ve written previously.  In Origis USA LLC v. Great Am. Ins. Co., Case No. N23C-07-102, the Delaware Superior Court held that because the primary policy had a “No Action” clause, the insureds’ suit against their D&O insurers for advancement of defense costs was premature as long as the underlying litigation was ongoing.  We wrote about that decision here.

In July, the Delaware Supreme Court remanded the case for further consideration in light of what it said were arguments from the parties ...

A recent opinion out of the District of Oregon analyzed a “care, custody, or control” exclusion, among others, in assessing whether an insurer must defend a property manager in a suit arising from a fire at a vacation home maintained by the policyholder.  In finding for the insured, the Court’s decision highlights a broad duty to defend where the allegations in the underlying complaint could establish any potential for an injury covered by the policy.

In Colony Insurance Co. v. Vacasa LLC, Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman held that Colony Insurance Company (“Colony” ...

On September 24, 2025, Judge Jennifer L. Hall from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware issued a decision in Amtrust Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Liberty Ins. Underwriters Inc., C.A. No. 21-347-JLH, holding that securities and derivative litigation against AmTrust were not covered by an excess D&O policy because the lawsuits arose out of alleged accounting improprieties that were the subject of a “Notice of Circumstances” the company reported to its insurers during an earlier policy period.

As we have previously discussed on this blog, D&O policies are ...

In this edition of Hoguet Newman’s Coverage Corner Blog, we look at a recent case from New York’s Appellate Division that considered a situation where an insured settled litigation with plaintiffs by assigning them its right to sue its insurers—and, specifically, whether the insured was “released” by the settlement such that any indemnification obligation was extinguished.   The case, Geiger v Hudson Excess Insurance Co., also considered whether an establishment serving food and drinks misrepresented the true nature of its business when it applied for insurance. 

By ...