<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.hnrklaw.com/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>HNRK | NYC Law Firm | Corporate Litigation Attorney and Lawyer</title>
					<link>https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog?rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to HNRK's Coverage Corner- Insurance Law Practices.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 15:57:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>Second Circuit Rules that CGL Insurer Must Provide Defense Coverage for
PFAS-Related Environmental Claim</title>
				<link>https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/second-circuit-rules-that-cgl-insurer-must-provide-defense-coverage-for-pfas-related-environmental-claim</link>
<dc:creator>Bradley J. Nash</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/second-circuit-rules-that-cgl-insurer-must-provide-defense-coverage-for-pfas-related-environmental-claim</guid>

					<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 09:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week at the Coverage Corner, we examine a Second Circuit decision that wades into hot-button topic:&nbsp; liability coverage for environmental claims involving PFAS (colloquially known as &ldquo;forever chemicals&rdquo;).&nbsp; In a summary ordered issued on May 4, 2026, in <a href="https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:US:3fc398db-4e7b-4995-9bce-237cfed1a927"><em>Town of Harrietstown v. Westchester Fire Ins. Co.</em>, Case No. 22-253-cv</a>, the Second Circuit affirmed a decision from the Northern District of New York, granting summary judgment to the insured on its claim for defense costs.&nbsp; We wrote about the district court&rsquo;s decision in an article in <a href="https://www.hnrklaw.com/newsroom-news-578">Chambers&rsquo; 2026 Insurance &amp;&nbsp;... </a></p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Delaware Supreme Court Holds That D&amp;O Policy’s “Bump-Up” Provision Does Not
Exclude Coverage for $28 Million Post-Merger Securities Settlement</title>
				<link>https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/delaware-supreme-court-holds-that-d-o-policys-bump-up-provision-does-not-exclude-coverage-for-28-million-post-merger-securities-settlement</link>
<dc:creator>Milan J. Sova</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/delaware-supreme-court-holds-that-d-o-policys-bump-up-provision-does-not-exclude-coverage-for-28-million-post-merger-securities-settlement</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:00:02 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year, the Delaware Supreme Court issued an important 3&ndash;2 decision on the application of a &ldquo;bump-up&rdquo; provision to losses arising from a merger transaction. (See our previous post about this type of policy provision, <a href="https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/court-rules-that-d-o-policys-bump-up-exclusion-does-not-apply-to-merger-transaction">here</a>.) In <em>Illinois National Insurance Co. v. Harman International Industries, Inc.</em>, C.A. No. N22C-05-098 (Del. Jan. 27, 2026), the court affirmed an award of summary judgment for the policyholder, holding that three D&amp;O insurers&mdash;AIG, Chubb, and Berkley&mdash;could not invoke a &ldquo;bump-up&rdquo; provision to deny coverage for a $28 million settlement of&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Federal District Court in Washington State Rules That Insurer Acted in Bad
Faith By Denying Defense Coverage Based On “Arguable” Interpretation of the
Policy</title>
				<link>https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/federal-district-court-rules-that-under-washington-law</link>
<dc:creator>Wendy  Tsang</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/federal-district-court-rules-that-under-washington-law</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:00:03 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>This week on Coverage Corner, we revisit <a href="https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:US:fcf3cfad-037e-485d-9102-8a439200933d"><em>Adolph v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin</em></a>, a coverage action in the United State District Court for the Western District of Washington, that we previously covered <a href="https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/washington-federal-court-clarifies-insurers-duties-no-duty-to-defend-for-general-casualty-but-rsui-liable-for-breach">here</a>. In a decision issued on April 15, 2026, the court granted plaintiffs&rsquo; motion for reconsideration and clarified the consequences of an insurer&rsquo;s denial of coverage based on an unreasonable interpretation of policy language.</p> <p><strong>Background: The Prior Summary Judgment Order</strong></p> <p>In its original summary judgment order, the Court held that the insurer, RSUI, had breached its&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Ninth Circuit Rules Insurer Acted in Bad Faith by Denying Insured a Defense
Where “A  Conceivable Basis for Coverage Existed”</title>
				<link>https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/ninth-circuit-rules-insurer-acted-in-bad-faith-by-denying-insured-a-defense-where-a-conceivable-basis-for-coverage-existed</link>
<dc:creator>Bradley J. Nash</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/ninth-circuit-rules-insurer-acted-in-bad-faith-by-denying-insured-a-defense-where-a-conceivable-basis-for-coverage-existed</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:00:04 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p class="xxxmsonormal"><span>On April 6, 2026, the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in <a href="https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:us:a3abe81e-e0bc-4665-94b9-e27b8681c985"><em>Bramblett v. Allied World Specialty Ins. Co.</em>, Case No. 25-489,</a> holding that Allied World acted in bad faith in denying a defense to its insured based on a Sexual Abuse Exclusion, where &ldquo;a conceivable basis for coverage existed&rdquo; as to at least some claims asserted in the compliant.</span></p> <p class="xxxmsonormal"><span>In <em>Bramblett</em>, the plaintiffs alleged they were the victims of sexual misconduct by an employee of the insured, including both verbal harassment and physical misconduct.&nbsp; The insured&rsquo;s policy expressly covered losses arising from claims alleging&nbsp;... </span></p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Experts Are Bracing for a “Brutal” Wildfire Season—Now is the Time for
Utility Companies and Other Business with Exposure to Wildfire Liabilities
to Stress-Test Their Insurance Programs</title>
				<link>https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/experts-are-bracing-for-a-brutal-wildfire-season-now-is-the-time-for-utility-companies-and-other-business-with-exposure-to-wildfire-liabilities-to-stress-test-their-insurance-programs</link>
<dc:creator>Bradley J. Nash</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/experts-are-bracing-for-a-brutal-wildfire-season-now-is-the-time-for-utility-companies-and-other-business-with-exposure-to-wildfire-liabilities-to-stress-test-their-insurance-programs</guid>

					<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:00:05 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Washington Post</em> reports: &ldquo;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2026/03/24/wildfires-plains-nebraska-colorado-california-risks/">Wildfires are ripping across the Great Plains, and other fare ups are popping up in Arizona and Colorado remarkably early this year</a>.&rdquo;&nbsp; Experts predict that the &ldquo;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2026/03/24/wildfires-plains-nebraska-colorado-california-risks/">fire season ahead is a recipe for concern&mdash;perhaps signaling an expanding frontier for fire risk in broader patches of the western half of the United States</a>.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p> <p>Heading into what is anticipated to be a &ldquo;brutal&rdquo; wildfire season, utility companies and other businesses are increasingly exposed to liability for the resulting losses.&nbsp; Liability insurance policies may provide coverage&nbsp;... </p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Canons of Construction: Divided Panel of the Second Circuit Holds General
Contractor Entitled to Additional Insured Coverage Under Subcontractor’s
CGL Policy</title>
				<link>https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/canons-of-construction-divided-panel-of-the-second-circuit-holds-general-contractor-entitled-to-additional-insured-coverage-under-subcontractors-cgl-policy</link>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/canons-of-construction-divided-panel-of-the-second-circuit-holds-general-contractor-entitled-to-additional-insured-coverage-under-subcontractors-cgl-policy</guid>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Washington Federal Court Addresses Reformation of CGL Policy, and Late
Notice and Prior Acts Exclusions under D&amp;O Policy</title>
				<link>https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/washington-federal-court-clarifies-insurers-duties-no-duty-to-defend-for-general-casualty-but-rsui-liable-for-breach</link>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/washington-federal-court-clarifies-insurers-duties-no-duty-to-defend-for-general-casualty-but-rsui-liable-for-breach</guid>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Delaware Court Rules DOJ’s Civil Investigative Demand Constitutes a Covered
Claim</title>
				<link>https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/delaware-court-rules-dojs-civil-investigative-demand-constitutes-a-covered-claim</link>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/delaware-court-rules-dojs-civil-investigative-demand-constitutes-a-covered-claim</guid>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Seventh Circuit Clarifies Excess Insurer Duties and Additional Insurer
Analysis Under Indiana Law</title>
				<link>https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/seventh-circuit-clarifies-excess-insurer-duties-and-additional-insurer-analysis-under-indiana-law</link>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/seventh-circuit-clarifies-excess-insurer-duties-and-additional-insurer-analysis-under-indiana-law</guid>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Southern District Uses Mutual Mistake Doctrine to Reform Policy and Find
Coverage</title>
				<link>https://www.hnrklaw.com/HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/southern-district-uses-mutual-mistake-doctrine-to-reform-policy-and-find-coverage</link>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>HNRK-Coverage-Corner-Blog/southern-district-uses-mutual-mistake-doctrine-to-reform-policy-and-find-coverage</guid>
</item>

			</channel></rss>