HNRK Coverage Corner
On September 13, 2019, Justice Borrok of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Colony Ins. Co. v. International Contr. Servs., LLC, 2019 NY Slip Op 32717(U), holding that issues of fact precluded summary judgment on a liability insurer’s disclaimer based on the insured’s failure to cooperate with the defense.
In the underlying personal injury litigation at issue in this case, the defendant ICS had its answer stricken based on its failure to cooperate in discovery (including failing to present a witness for a court-ordered deposition and to provide an ...
On September 17, 2019, Judge Hurd of the NDNY issued a decision in Lohnes v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., Case No. 19-cv-00068, dismissing a claim for bad faith claims handling for failure to plead “specific conduct” by the insurer distinct from the underlying breach of the policy.
As previously discussed on this blog (see here, here, and here), New York law does not recognize a separate tort claim for bad faith claims handling. However, the courts—beginning with a pair of Court of Appeals decisions, Bi-Economy Market, Inc. v. Harleysville Ins. Co. of N.Y., 10 N.Y.3d 187 (2008) and ...
On August 27, 2019, Judge Pauley of the SDNY issued a decision in Gemini Ins. Co. v. Titan Construction Servs., Case No. 17-cv-8963, dismissing a declaratory judgment claim as premature because the lability insurer’s duty to indemnify would depend on facts to be developed in the underlying lawsuit against the insured. The court explained:
It has long been well-established that a liability insurer may bring an action for a declaratory judgment against the parties in an underlying lawsuit involving its insured without waiting for the underlying action to proceed to judgment ...
On August 29, 2019, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in Pitzer College v. Indian Harbor Ins. Co., Case No. S239510, ruling (in response to a certified question from the Ninth Circuit) that New York’s no-prejudice rule—under which a first-party insurer can avoid coverage based on delayed notice without showing prejudice—is contrary to a “fundamental public policy” of California.
Unlike the majority of states, New York common law does not require an insurer to demonstrate prejudice to disclaim coverage based on late notice by the insured. As previously ...
On September 10, 2019, Judge Reiss of the WDNY issued a decision in Korn v. Federal Ins. Co., Case No. 1:17-cv-00188, ruling that an insurance carrier providing a defense to the insured in a criminal prosecution had no obligation to “monitor” the fees incurred by defense counsel to ensure that the coverage was not exhausted prior to trial.
Korn, an insured brought breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract claims against a liability insurer, alleging that the insurance company failed “to monitor his criminal defense attorneys, audit the legal fees they incurred, and ...
On August 30, 2019, Justice Masley of the New York County Commercial Division issued a decision in Otsuka Am., Inc. v. Crum Forster Specialty Ins. Co., Index No. 650463/2019, ruling that coverage opinions prepared by outside counsel for an insurer are discoverable, explaining:
In the context of insurance, the payment or rejection of claims is a part of the regular business of an insurance company. Consequently, documents prepared in the ordinary course of an insurance company’s investigation to determine whether to accept or reject coverage and to evaluate the extent of a ...
On August 26, 2019, Judge Caproni of the SDNY issued a decision in Spandex House, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., Case No. 18-CV-8367 (VEC), enforcing an IP exclusion in a CGL policy that circumvented the “entire action” rule by precluding both defense and indemnity coverage for an otherwise-covered “advertising injury” claim if that claim was joined with any IP claim unconnected to advertising. As Judge Caproni explains, under a duty to defend policy, “if a lawsuit contains a mix of allegations covered by an insurance policy and other allegations falling outside the ...
Search Blog
Recent Posts
- Manhattan Appellate Court Rules That D&O Policy’s Prior Acts Exclusion Does Not Warrant Complete Denial of Coverage Unless All Causes of Action Arise Out of Excluded Acts
- Second Circuit Rules that CGL Insurer Must Provide Defense Coverage for PFAS-Related Environmental Claim
- Delaware Supreme Court Holds That D&O Policy’s “Bump-Up” Provision Does Not Exclude Coverage for $28 Million Post-Merger Securities Settlement
- Federal District Court in Washington State Rules That Insurer Acted in Bad Faith By Denying Defense Coverage Based On “Arguable” Interpretation of the Policy
- Ninth Circuit Rules Insurer Acted in Bad Faith by Denying Insured a Defense Where “A Conceivable Basis for Coverage Existed”
- Experts Are Bracing for a “Brutal” Wildfire Season—Now is the Time for Utility Companies and Other Business with Exposure to Wildfire Liabilities to Stress-Test Their Insurance Programs
- Canons of Construction: Divided Panel of the Second Circuit Holds General Contractor Entitled to Additional Insured Coverage Under Subcontractor’s CGL Policy
- Washington Federal Court Addresses Reformation of CGL Policy, and Late Notice and Prior Acts Exclusions under D&O Policy
- Delaware Court Rules DOJ’s Civil Investigative Demand Constitutes a Covered Claim
- Seventh Circuit Clarifies Excess Insurer Duties and Additional Insurer Analysis Under Indiana Law
Popular Categories
- Policy Exclusions
- D&O Policies
- CGL Policies
- Related Claims
- Insurance Coverage
- Additional Insured Endorsement
- Construction
- Pollution Exclusion
- E&O Policies
- Duty to Defend
- Notice
- Damages
- Occurrence/Accident
- Business Interruption Coverage
- Bad Faith Claims Handling
- Rules of Interpretation
- Indemnification and Advancement
- COVID-19
- Cyber Coverage
- Duty to Cooperate
- Advertising Injury
- Personal and Advertising Injury
- Insurance Brokers
- Confict of Laws
- Discovery/Disclosure
- Appraisal
- Attorney Fees
- Excess Insurance
- Assignment of Claims
- Covered Loss
- Disability discrimination
- Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
- Privilege/Work Product
- Priority of Coverage
- Contracts
- Intellectual Property
- Professional Malpractice
- Intervention/Joinder
- Rescission
- Subrogation
- General Business Law
- Settlements
- Unfair Claims Settlement Practices
Archives
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- May 2025
- February 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- September 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- November 2021
- June 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
